By GARETT VALCOURT
Discussion surrounding the newly acquired Lake Cassidy property resurfaced during the Holmes County Board of County Commissioners’ regular meeting last week, as officials addressed infrastructure concerns, access control, and legal enforcement at the half-acre parcel.
County Coordinator David Corbin raised questions regarding the placement of a concrete pad and a portable restroom unit on the site. “Since the lake is located in Commissioner Newsom’s district, I deferred installation pending further direction,” said Corbin. “There’s not much usable land there, and any damage to county property could be costly.”
Corbin estimated that replacing a damaged ADA-compliant portable restroom could cost the county approximately $3,000. He also asked the board to determine whether access to the property should be managed via decals or key fobs.
Commissioner Brandon Newsom emphasized that a gated entrance had been a priority of the original property sellers. He stated that regardless of the access method selected, fobs or decals, a gate would be necessary to secure both the property and any public amenities installed.
“I believe a gate is essential,” Newsom said. “Without it, any asset placed on the property, such as a restroom unit, could be vulnerable to damage.”
The conversation then turned to the property’s capacity and safety. Corbin questioned how many individuals could legally occupy the limited space, especially in relation to emergency vehicle access and parking logistics.
“We need to consider how many people can be there at one time,” Corbin said. “We also have to ensure that emergency vehicles can access and navigate the property safely.”
In response to concerns about unauthorized access, County Attorney Nate Nolin was asked how violations related to gate entry, whether by fob or decal, would be enforced. Holmes County Sheriff John Tate requested that Nolin consult with the State Attorney’s Office to determine appropriate enforcement measures that would comply with constitutional protections, given the property’s status as public land.
Nolin agreed to seek guidance from the State Attorney and indicated he would draft amendments to the county’s current ordinance, specifically addressing Lake Cassidy as distinct from other public parks.
At this time, the Board reached a consensus to delay installation of both a gate and portable restroom facilities until legal and logistical matters are resolved.
In a separate point of discussion, Nolin noted that the previous property owners had indicated plans to install fencing adjacent to the county-owned portion of the lake. He added that talks had been held regarding grading the embankment, though no formal action has been taken.
The Lake Cassidy property was acquired earlier this year with the intent of increasing public access and recreation opportunities. However, officials continue to deliberate on how best to manage the site while balancing security, accessibility, and legal obligations.
Staff Report 